I am mostly certainly not brain dead. The complexity of the Federal Reserve is hard for most people (including myself) to grasp. Banking is complicated iin general. Banking and commercial law are incoherent compared to almost any other field. The law and practices emerged in London and to some degree Holland during the MIddle Ages.
I would argue for finding out what it is, then reading both sides of the control side. Jews might appear to control banking because for centuries Europe had strict laws forbidding Christians to practice usury and interest was defined as usury. If Jews dominated, this was because of religious prejudice. European society needed banking services so they were forced to turn the Jews. The Rotschild family was very prominent. Jews were welcome, then they were completely expelled, over and over again. It is ludicrous to believe there was a Jewish conspiracy at any point in time. Jews were barred from practicing other professions, trades. There was such hatred yet they were essential. Kings became very enmeshed with Jewish banking families. Jews as Jews is a very different story. For me, it is similar to saying all Americans are like the Rockefellers and Gates.
The concept of a central bank no longer seems controversial. AntiSemiticism clearly reigns until the present. The Founders found central banking extremely controversial. From my readings, it also seems that people either heartily supported a central bank or were adamnantly opposed. I've read few middle of the road readings. The Internet has a wealth of material on both sides. How could we function in a global society without a central bank? I feel it is important to know and understand both views. Hence, neutral material first and opinion later.
Another great source would be a British magazine called The Economist. It is the leading economics and politcal magazine worldwide. I love it because it more than reports facts the way newspapers do. It is written in a nonAmerican voice yet b/c of the impact of American policy on the rest of the world, American actions are primarily reported. The problem is that it is very expensive. Any public library should have it available. The magazine appears to cover most mainstream opinions when it reports. The Economist is sort of the Mercedes Benz of economics reporting.
I believe the Fed is so important to our lives that all high school students should have rudimentary knowledge of it. With my Ivy League education, I was only briefly exposed to it. If I did not take American history, I doubt it would have been mentioned. Its importance is so real that I've been playing catch up ever after. Most high school students have no idea when the Civil War happened but I can fantasize.